Not strictly necessary, but a "natural" thing to do in a classical
C++ code base.
Move the tiny trip-table into its own source file, since it also
has its own header.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a humongous commit, because it touches all parts of the
code. It removes the last user of our horrible TABLE macros, which
simulate std::vector<> in a very clumsy way.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the sorted_owning_table depends on the fact that
different elements never compare as equal, make the
comparison function safer in that respect. If all failes,
compare the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This had to be done simultaneously, because the table macros
do not work properly with C++ objects.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since struct divecomputer is now fully C++ (i.e. cleans up
after itself), we can simply turn the list of divecomputers
into an std::vector<>. This makes the code quite a bit simpler,
because the first divecomputer was actually a subobject.
Yes, this makes the common case of a single divecomputer a
little bit less efficient, but it really shouldn't matter.
If it does, we can still write a special std::vector<>-
like container that keeps the first element inline.
This change makes pointers-to-divecomputers not stable.
So always access the divecomputer via its index. As
far as I can tell, most of the code already does this.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Not strictly necessary, but more idiomatic C++ and less
polution of the global namespace. This one is so trivial
that there seems to be no reason not to do it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a rather long commit, because it refactors lots of the event
code from pointer to value semantics: pointers to entries in an
std::vector<> are not stable, so better use indexes.
To step through the event-list at diven time stamps, add *_loop classes,
which encapsulate state that had to be manually handled before by
the caller. I'm not happy about the interface, but it tries to
mirror the one we had before.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a hairy one, because the sample code is rather tricky.
There was a pattern of looping through pairs of adjacent samples,
for interpolation purposes. Add an range adapter to generalize
such loops.
Removes the finish_sample() function: The code would call
prepare_sample() to start parsing of samples and then
finish_sample() to actuall add it. I.e. a kind of commit().
Since, with one exception, all users of prepare_sample()
called finish_sample() in all code paths, we might just add
the sample in the first place. The exception was sample_end()
in parse.cpp. This brings a small change: samples are now
added, even if they could only be parsed partially. I doubt
that this makes any difference, since it will only happen
for broken divelogs anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This allows us to use non-C member variables. Convert a number
of pointers to unique_ptr<>s.
Code in uemis-downloader.cpp had to be refactored, because
it mixed owning and non-owning pointers. Mad.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since everything is C++ now, we can use unique_ptr<>s. This makes
the code significantly shorter, because we can now use the default
move constructor and assignment operators.
This has a semantic change when std::move()-ing the divelog:
now not the contents of the tables are moved, but the pointers.
That is, the moved-from object now has no more tables and
must not be used anymore. This made it necessary to replace
std::move()s by std::swap()s. In that regard, the old code was
in principle broken: it used moved-from objects, which may work
but usually doesn't.
This commit adds a myriad of .get() function calls where the code
expects a C-style pointer. The plan is to remove virtually all of
them, when we move free-standing functions into the class it acts
on. Or, replace C-style pointers by references where we don't support
NULL.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There were a number of free standing functions acting on a
dive-site-table. Make them member functions. This allows
for shorter names. Use the get_idx() function of the base
class, which returns a size_t instead of an int (since that
is what the standard, somewhat unfortunately, uses).
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
This is a long commit, because it introduces a new abstraction:
a general std::vector<> of std::unique_ptrs<>.
Moreover, it replaces a number of pointers by C++ references,
when the callee does not suppoert null objects.
This simplifies memory management and makes ownership more
explicit. It is a proof-of-concept and a test-bed for
the other core data structrures.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Makes the code much nicer to read.
Default initialize cylinder_t to the empty cylinder.
This produces lots of warnings, because most structure are now
not PODs anymore and shouldn't be erased using memset().
These memset()s will be removed one-by-one and replaced by
proper constructors.
The whole ordeal made it necessary to add a constructor to
struct event. To simplify things the whole optimization of
the variable-size event names was removed. In upcoming commits
this will be replaced by std::string anyway.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
To my understanding, declaring empty parameter lists using "(void)"
is an artifact from the bad old K&R times, when functions were
declared without(!) parameters. Which in hindsight was an absolute
recipe for disaster. So for backwards compatibility, functions
without parameters had to be declared using "(void)" as "()"
could also mean "any function".
That was 40 years ago. Meanwhile, C++ introduced references,
which made it a necessity to declare the function parameters.
So "(void)" is redundant and inconsistent in C++ code and
just makes no sense.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Since the taxonomy is now a real C++ struct with constructor
and destructor, dive_site has to be converted to C++ as well.
A bit hairy for now, but will ultimately be distinctly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Had to rewrite the thing, because gcc's warnings don't work
with templatized var-args. Since there is no string-format.cpp
and I didn't want to inline it, moved it to format.cpp.
String formatting is distributed around at least four
headers: membuffer.h, subsurface-string.h, format.h
and format-string.h. This really should be unified!
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Quite a bit of fallout in users of this structure.
Conveniently, since git-access.cpp is now C++ we can move
some helpers from the monstrous qthelper.cpp to git-access.cpp.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
There was a pattern of code like
match_action(line, state, dive_action, ARRAY_SIZE(dive_action));
The doubling of the array might cause copy & paste errors, where
only one array is replaced.
Therefore, determine the length of the array with (hopefully
easily understood) template tricksery.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
When iterating over the converted strings of a line, the
first entry of the array would be popped off, leading to
a full copy of the remaining array.
Instead, use an index in the parser state.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
The converted strings were stored in a membuffer and later
converted to std::strings. Generate an std::string directly
to avoid unnecessary copying.
Ultimately, when the core structures are converted to
std::string, there should be no copying of the string data
at all (unless formatting is applied or small string
optimization kicks in, of course).
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Make the memory management easier to follow. I feel that the old
code was leaking left and right, but not sure because it was so
intractable.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
Simplifies memory management. Think about unglobalizing this,
once everything is in C++ so that we can put an std::string
into struct divelog.
Signed-off-by: Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger@mail.tuwien.ac.at>
