VPM-B: Adjust Subsurface conservatism
Reverting commit 3d8e5b638ad4c1fbb43f6dd5f535bf0b33a51f0b makes the CVA calculation marginally less conservative, and one of the tests fails as a result. This tiny adjustment to the conservatism fixes that. Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <dirk@hohndel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
26cab60518
commit
936bd52a42
4
deco.c
4
deco.c
@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
|
||||
#define cube(x) (x * x * x)
|
||||
|
||||
// Subsurface appears to produce marginally less conservative plans than our benchmarks
|
||||
// Introduce 1% additional conservatism
|
||||
#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.01
|
||||
// Introduce 1.2% additional conservatism
|
||||
#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.012
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
extern bool in_planner();
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user